The subtle difference between knowledge and 3D knowledge

Submitted by Isto Huvila on Thu, 03/08/2018 - 18:14

Publication Type:

Journal Article

Authors:

Isto Huvila

Source:

Hamburger Journal für Kulturanthropologie, Volume 7, Number 1, p.99-111 (2017)

URL:

https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/hjk/article/view/1196

Keywords:

3d

Abstract:

This article discusses the implications of how attaching three-dimensional artefacts with different labels such as visualisation, model or virtual form have an impact on the artefact itself, how it is produced and received, and in the end, how the artefact engages in knowledge production, and what kind of knowledge comes out of the process. It is proposed that there is not only a difference between knowledge and three-dimensional knowledge, but also between knowledge derived from artefacts called by different names. The three-dimensional artefacts are intermediaries or boundary objects between the past and the present, and the makers and users of these objects. Taking the differences in names and how they are linked to epistemological differences seriously and making them visible is argued to be a key to a more reflexive and productive making and use of three-dimensional artefacts.
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Huvila2017i.pdf71.15 KB

Taxonomy terms:

Archaeology and Archaeological Information in the Digital Society shows how the digitization of archaeological information, tools and workflows, and their interplay with both old and new non-digital practices throughout the archaeological information process, affect the outcomes of archaeological work, and in the end, our general understanding of the human past.

Read more

Taking Health Information Behaviour into Account: implications of a neglected element for success- ful implementation of consumer health technologies on older adults (HIBA) is an Academy of Finland funded research project at Åbo Akademi University.

Read more

Sheds new light on the potential of extra-academic knowledge-making as a contribution in formations of knowledge throughout society, explores extra-academic knowledge as a useful resource in academy, policy development, evidence based practices, and innovation, and focuses on the informational dimensions, stemming from and grounded in an informationscience perspective, which provides the means to address practical information-related issues throughout knowledge-making processes.

Read more